A Guide to Effective Goal Setting
Setting a goal is the first step toward turning the invisible into the visible. However, not all goals are created equal. An effective goal is one that is clearly defined and has a strategic path to completion. This is where the popular SMART criteria come into play, providing a framework to set you up for success.
"A goal properly set is halfway reached." – Zig Ziglar
The SMART acronym stands for Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound. Let's break down what each of these means in the context of your 60-day plan. A 'specific' goal answers the "W" questions: what do I want to accomplish? Why is this goal important? Who is involved? Where is it located? Which resources are involved? Vague goals like "get in shape" are less effective than "join a gym and work out 3 times a week."
Key Takeaway: The more specific your goal, the clearer your path to achieving it becomes. Clarity eliminates confusion and helps you focus your efforts.
The SMART Goal Framework
Criteria | Description | Example |
---|---|---|
Specific | Clearly define what you want to accomplish. | "I want to write a 10,000-word e-book on time management." |
Measurable | Define how you will track progress. | "I will write 250 words every weekday." |
Achievable | Ensure the goal is realistic for you. | "With my schedule, writing 250 words daily is possible." |
Relevant | The goal should align with your broader ambitions. | "This e-book will establish me as an expert in my field." |
Time-bound | Set a clear deadline. | "I will complete the first draft in 60 days." |
Beyond setting the goal, it's crucial to review it regularly. A 60-day plan is dynamic. Weekly check-ins allow you to adjust your tactics based on what's working and what isn't. This agile approach is key to navigating obstacles without losing momentum. For more on this, see our article on Mastering Time Management.
Related Articles:
Source References:
- Doran, G. T. (1981). There's a S.M.A.R.T. way to write management's goals and objectives. *Management Review*, 70(11), 35–36.